All iit madras assets blender bs degree data science & applications english english book english ii featured github hugo iitm bs degree math mathematics notes programming reasoning ssc exam

IIT Madras

real and complex numbers

Notes

real and complex numbers

Here’s an explanation of real numbers and complex numbers in a notes format, designed for ease of understanding with emojis: Real Numbers (R) 🌍 Real numbers are an expansion of rational numbers and fill up the entire number line 📏, including all the “gaps” that rational numbers leave. They are denoted by the symbol R. What fills the gaps? Irrational Numbers 💫 Irrational numbers are those that cannot be written as a simple fraction p/q, where p and q are integers. They are simply numbers that are not rational. A classic example is the square root of 2 (√2). You can physically draw a line segment of length √2 (e.g., the hypotenuse of a square with sides of length 1). However, it cannot be precisely expressed as a ratio of two integers. This fact was known to ancient Greeks like Pythagoras, and its irrationality was reportedly proved by his follower Hippasus around 500 BCE, shocking the Pythagoreans who believed rational numbers formed the basis of all science. In general, the square root of any integer that is not a perfect square (e.g., √3, √5, √6) is an irrational number. Other well-known irrational numbers include pi (π) (the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter) and e (used in natural logarithms). These numbers have infinite non-repeating decimal expansions. Density Property 🌊 Just like rational numbers, real numbers are dense: you can always find another real number between any two distinct real numbers (for example, by taking their average). This means there are no “gaps” in the real number line. Relationship to other Number Sets 🌳 Every natural number is an integer, every integer is a rational number, and every rational number is a real number. The set of natural numbers (N) is a subset of integers (Z). The set of integers (Z) is a subset of rational numbers (Q). The set of rational numbers (Q) is a proper subset of real numbers (R). This means that while all rational numbers are real numbers, there are real numbers (the irrationals) that are not rational. This hierarchical relationship can be visualized using Venn diagrams, where N is the innermost circle, followed by Z, then Q, and finally R as the largest encompassing circle. “Size” of Infinity ✨ Even though rational numbers are dense, the set of real numbers has a larger “size” or cardinality of infinity than the set of natural numbers, integers, or rational numbers. This implies there are vastly more irrational numbers than rational numbers. Complex Numbers (C) 🌌 The Need for Expansion 🚧 When dealing with operations like square roots of negative numbers, the existing real number system falls short. For instance, if you try to find the square root of -1 (√-1), you cannot find a real number that, when multiplied by itself, yields a negative result. This is because the rule for multiplication of signs states that if two numbers have the same sign (either both positive or both negative), their product is always positive. This limitation is also seen when solving quadratic equations: if the discriminant (b² - 4ac) is less than 0, it means you’d be taking the square root of a negative number, which implies no real solutions. Introducing Complex Numbers ✨ To allow for the square roots of negative numbers, a new class of numbers called complex numbers was created. Complex numbers extend the real number system. Symbol ℂ While the provided sources do not explicitly state a symbol for complex numbers, they follow a pattern of using single letters (N, Z, Q, R) for other number sets. Complex numbers are commonly denoted by C (or ℂ). This information is not directly from the provided sources and you may want to independently verify it. Beyond this Course 📚 The provided sources indicate that the study of complex numbers is generally beyond the scope of this particular course.


FUnctions - Examples

Notes

FUnctions - Examples

Based on the sources and our conversation history, functions are described as a special type of relation where each element in the input set is mapped to exactly one element in the output set. Abstractly, a function can be thought of as a machine that produces an output for a given input. Here are several examples of functions found in the sources: Functions on Numbers: The Square Function: This is a frequently used example. Given an input x, it returns x². It can be written as f(x) = x². The domain and codomain are often considered the set of real numbers (R). The range is the set of non-negative real numbers, as the output of squaring any real number is always positive or zero. The graph of this function is a parabola. Linear Functions: These are functions of the form f(x) = ax + b or mx + c, where a (or m) and b (or c) are real numbers and a ≠ 0. They define a straight line when graphed. A specific example given is 3.5x + 5.7. Another linear function example is f(x) = 7x + 2 and f(x) = x. Quadratic Functions: These are functions of the form f(x) = ax² + bx + c, where a ≠ 0, and a, b, c are real numbers. The graph of any quadratic function is always a parabola. An example of a shifted parabola is 5x² + 3. Polynomial Functions: A general polynomial function of degree n is described as f(x) = anxⁿ + an-1xⁿ⁻¹ + ... + a₀x⁰, where an ≠ 0 and n is a natural number. They consist of mathematical terms added together, involving only addition, subtraction, multiplication, and natural exponents of variables. An example given is f(x) = x³ + 5. Exponential Functions: These are of the form f(x) = aˣ, where a > 0 and a ≠ 1. The natural exponential function, f(x) = eˣ, is a specific example where e > 1. Other examples include f(x) = 2ˣ and f(x) = (1/2)ˣ. Logarithmic Functions: These are of the form f(x) = logₐ(x), where a > 0 and a ≠ 1. They are the inverse of exponential functions. The natural logarithmic function is f(x) = loge x = ln x, and the common logarithmic function is f(x) = log₁₀ x = log x. The domain is the set of all positive real numbers. Square Root Function: The function f(x) = √x is discussed. By convention, this usually refers to the positive square root. The domain depends on the allowed codomain; if the codomain is restricted to real numbers, the domain is [0, ∞). If complex numbers are allowed as output, the domain can be all real numbers. Absolute Value Function: Denoted by f(x) = |x|, this function returns x if x ≥ 0 and -x if x < 0. It is used as an example to check for injectivity (it is not one-to-one) and continuity at x=0 (it is continuous). Step Functions: Examples include the Floor function, f(x) = ⌊x⌋ (greatest integer value less than or equal to x), and the Ceiling function, f(x) = ⌈x⌉ (smallest integer value greater than or equal to x). Trigonometric Functions: Examples mentioned include sin x, cos x, and tan x. f(x) = sin x is also used to check for differentiability. Constant Function: f(x) = c is used to illustrate differentiation. Rational Function: An example of a real-valued function given is f(x) = (5x+9)/(2x). Function Defined on an Interval: f(x) = 2x - 1 defined on the interval `` is used in the context of calculating area under a curve. Function used in SSE: f(x) = 2x - 2 is implicitly used in a sum squared error calculation example. Bounded Function Example: f(x) = 1/(x² + 1) is shown to be a bounded function with 0 ≤ f(x) ≤ 1. Functions on Other Sets:


Prime NUmbers

Notes

Prime NUmbers

Based on the sources and our conversation history, here’s a comprehensive overview of prime numbers: Definition: A prime number is a natural number that has no factors other than 1 and itself. It must have exactly two factors. Factors: The only factors of a prime number p are 1 and p. Why 1 is Not Prime: It is important that a prime number must have two separate factors. While 1 has 1 as a factor (because 1 times 1 is 1), it has only one factor, which is 1 itself. Therefore, 1 is technically not considered a prime number. Smallest Primes: The smallest prime number is 2 because it has exactly two factors: 1 and itself. The next prime numbers are 3, 5, and 7. Even Numbers: After the number 2, no even numbers can be prime because they are all multiples of 2, meaning 2 divides them in addition to 1 and themselves. For example, 4 is divisible by 2, and 6 is not prime because it’s a multiple of 3. Generating Primes (Sieve of Eratosthenes): There is a method called the sieve of Eratosthenes to generate prime numbers. You start by listing numbers (e.g., from 1 to 100). You know 1 is not prime. You take the first unmarked number, which is 2, declare it a prime, and then knock off all its multiples (all the even numbers) as non-primes. Then, you look for the next number that hasn’t been marked off, which is 3, declare it a prime, and mark off all its multiples (some of which might already be marked). You continue this process; the next unmarked number will be the next prime (e.g., 5 is found this way). This method is a good way to generate primes up to a certain number without missing any. Prime Factorization: A very important fact is that every number can be uniquely factorized into the prime numbers that form it. This is also called the prime factorization. For example, 12 can be written as 2 × 6 or 4 × 3, but its fundamental unique prime factorization is 2 × 2 × 3, or using exponentiation, 2² × 3. Similarly, 126 is 2 × 3² × 7. This unique decomposition property is used implicitly a lot. Infinitude of Primes: It is a known result that the set of prime numbers is an infinite set. There cannot be a largest prime number. Euclid provided a proof for this. The proof involves assuming there is a finite list of all primes (p₁, p₂, …, pk), constructing a new number N by multiplying all these primes together and adding 1 (N = p₁ × p₂ × … × pk + 1). This new number N must be larger than any prime in the list. If the list was exhaustive of all primes, N must be composite (not prime). If N is composite, it must have a prime factor, and this prime factor must be in the original list (say pⱼ). So, pⱼ divides N. However, pⱼ also divides the product p₁ × p₂ × … × pk (since pⱼ is one of the factors). A property of divisibility states that if a number divides a sum (a+b) and also divides one part (a), it must divide the other part (b). In this case, pⱼ divides N (the sum) and pⱼ divides the product (one part), so pⱼ must divide 1 (the other part). But pⱼ is a prime number, which is by definition greater than 1, and therefore cannot divide 1. This is a contradiction, meaning the initial assumption (that the list of primes is finite) must be false. Thus, the set of primes is infinite, and there is no largest prime. Distribution: Prime numbers have been extensively studied in an area called number theory. One topic is their distribution within the natural numbers. As numbers get larger, the gaps between primes tend to become larger. The function π(x) denotes the number of primes less than or equal to a given number x. For large x, π(x) is approximately x / log(x). Applications: Despite seemingly abstract, prime numbers are actually quite useful. One important application is in cryptography. Cryptography affects day-to-day life, such as protecting electronic commerce transactions. Much of this encryption relies on the existence of large prime numbers and the fact that it is difficult to factorize the product of two large primes. Computational Problems: There are two related computational problems: checking if a number is prime (primality testing) and finding the prime factors of a number (factorization). Primality testing can be done efficiently. However, there is no efficient way to factorize a large number. This paradox (being able to check if a number is prime efficiently, but not being able to factorize it quickly if it isn’t prime) is why primes are important in cryptography. Set Representation: The set of prime numbers can be defined as a subset of the natural numbers. Using set comprehension, the set of primes (P) can be defined as the set of natural numbers p such that the factors of p consist of exactly two elements {1, p}, and p is not 1. In summary, prime numbers are foundational in number theory, possess unique properties like the basis for unique prime factorization, are infinite in quantity, and have significant practical applications, particularly in securing digital communications.


set versus collection

Notes

set versus collection

Based on the sources and our conversation history, the key distinction between a set and a collection arises from foundational issues in set theory, particularly when dealing with infinite collections. Here’s a breakdown: Informally, a set is often described as a collection of items. Another source defines a set as a collection of well-defined items. For finite collections, the idea that any collection is a set seems reasonable. Examples of finite sets given include the days of the week, the factors of a number like 24, the set of natural numbers less than 10, and months in a year. However, the sources explicitly state that not every collection is in fact a set. This becomes particularly problematic when dealing with infinite collections. The reason for this caution stems from what is known as Russell’s Paradox. This paradox questioned the fundamental idea that any collection could be considered a set, especially in the context of trying to use set theory as a foundation for all of mathematics. Bertrand Russell’s work demonstrated that the collection of “all sets” leads to a problem if one assumes it is itself a set. The paradox is illustrated by considering a collection, say ‘S’, defined using set comprehension as the subset of all sets that do not contain themselves. If we assume that the collection of all sets exists as a set, then this subset ‘S’ is also a set because it is defined by applying a condition (set comprehension) to an existing set (the set of all sets). The paradox then asks whether this set ‘S’ belongs to itself. If ‘S’ belongs to itself, then by its own definition (sets in S do not contain themselves), it cannot belong to itself. This is a contradiction. If ‘S’ does not belong to itself, then by the condition used to define ‘S’ (sets in S are those that do not contain themselves), it must belong to itself. This is also a contradiction. The conclusion from this paradox is that the initial assumption that leads to the contradiction must be false. The assumption that goes wrong is the assumption that there is a set of all sets. Therefore, not every collection can be called a set; specifically, the collection of all sets does not exist as a set. In modern mathematics, when one is unsure if a collection satisfies the necessary properties to be a set, it is sometimes safer to refer to it as a class. A class is simply a collection of objects that may not have the implied properties expected from sets. The sources advise that when working with sets, especially in this course, it is safe to assume that known collections of numbers like natural numbers (N), integers (Z), rational numbers (Q), and real numbers (R) are sets. New sets should be constructed from these existing, well-defined sets using standard set operations like union, intersection, Cartesian product, and set comprehension. The caution is against “manufacturing sets out of thin air”, such as the problematic “set of all sets”. In summary, while “set” is often used informally to mean “collection,” the sources highlight that in formal mathematics, particularly concerning infinite collections and foundational issues, not every collection is a valid set due to paradoxes like Russell’s Paradox. The collection of all sets is a key example of a collection that is not a set. The term “class” is sometimes used for collections that might not be sets.


Degree of infinity

Notes

Degree of infinity

Based on the sources and our conversation history, the concept of “Degrees of Infinity” refers to the idea that different infinite sets can have different “sizes” or cardinalities. While the term “Degree of Affinity” was not found in the sources, “Degrees of Infinity” was discussed as a way to understand the magnitude of infinite sets. Here’s what the sources explain about this concept: Cardinality is the term used to denote the number of elements in a set. For finite sets, determining cardinality is straightforward – you simply count the elements. This count results in a natural number. The challenge arises when dealing with infinite sets. Examples of infinite sets discussed include the natural numbers (N), the integers (Z), the rational numbers (Q), and the real numbers (R). Some of these sets, like natural numbers and integers, are described as discrete, while rational numbers are described as dense. Despite these structural differences, the question is whether they all have the same “size” or if there are more elements in one infinite set than another. This leads to the core question: are there degrees of infinity?. To compare the sizes of infinite sets, the concept of a bijection is used. If a bijection (a one-to-one and onto function) exists between the set of natural numbers (N) and another set X, it means you can effectively pair up the elements of N with the elements of X. This process allows you to enumerate the elements of X, essentially listing them out in an ordered sequence. Sets that can be enumerated in this way are considered to have the same cardinality as the natural numbers. Examples in the sources include the set of integers and even pairs of integers (Z cross Z), suggesting they can be enumerated. However, the sources demonstrate that the set of real numbers (R) has a higher degree of infinity than the natural numbers. This is shown using a method similar to Cantor’s diagonal argument. By considering infinite sequences of 0s and 1s (which can represent real numbers, specifically those between 0 and 1), it’s proven that no matter how you try to list or enumerate all such sequences, you can always construct a new sequence that is not on your list. This argument shows that the set of infinite 0,1 sequences is not countable. Since these sequences can be mapped to real numbers in the interval, this proves that even this small fraction of the real numbers, and therefore the entire set of real numbers (R), cannot be enumerated. This distinction—being able to enumerate (like N, Z, Q) versus not being able to enumerate (like R)—means that the set of real numbers is “larger” in terms of cardinality than the set of natural numbers, integers, or rational numbers. This demonstrates that there are indeed different degrees of infinity. The sources also briefly mention the continuum hypothesis, a significant open question in set theory concerning whether there exist infinite sets with cardinality strictly between that of the natural numbers (countable infinity) and the real numbers (uncountable infinity). It is noted that this question was shown to be independent of the standard axioms of set theory. In summary, the concept of “degrees of infinity” highlights that not all infinite sets are the same size; sets like the real numbers are proven to be “larger” (uncountable) than sets like the natural numbers (countable), establishing different levels of infinity.


Activity Questions 2.3

Notes

Activity Questions 2.3

The letter _______ by Sarah. (Active voice: Sarah will post the letter) Has been posted Have been posted Will have been posted Will be posted Solution Based on the provided sources, the correct tense marker to complete the sentence ‘The letter _______ by Sarah.’, where the active voice is ‘Sarah will post the letter’, is Will be posted. Here’s the explanation, drawing on the sources: The original active sentence is ‘Sarah will post the letter’. This sentence uses the structure ‘will’ + base verb (‘post’). This structure indicates the future tense. In active sentences, the subject (‘Sarah’) is the doer of the action (‘post’). The object (’the letter’) is what the action is done to. To change an active sentence to the passive voice, the object of the active sentence becomes the subject of the passive sentence (‘The letter’). The verb is changed to a passive form, and the original subject (the agent) can be included in a ‘by’ phrase (‘by Sarah’). The general structure for the passive voice is a form of the auxiliary verb ‘be’ plus the past participle of the main verb. The tense of the passive verb must match the tense of the active verb. Since the active sentence is in the future tense (‘will post’), the passive form must also be in the future tense. The sources show that the passive structure for verbs using ‘will’ is ‘will be’ + past participle. For example, the active “Somebody will clean the office tomorrow” becomes the passive “The office will be cleaned tomorrow”. The verb ‘post’ is a regular verb. For regular verbs, the past simple and past participle forms are typically created by adding ‘-ed’. Following this pattern (like ‘clean’ -> ‘cleaned’), the past participle of ‘post’ is ‘posted’. Combining the future passive structure (‘will be’ + past participle) with the past participle ‘posted’, we get ‘will be posted’. Let’s look at the options provided:


Activity Questions 2.4

Notes

Activity Questions 2.4

Complete the following sentences with the most appropriate word. (Q1-3) Where is my ________ sister? Favouring Favoursome Favourite Fevor Solution Based on the analysis of the sentence structure and the relevant information from the sources, the correct option to complete the sentence “Where is my ________ sister?” is Favourite. Here’s the explanation: The sentence requires a word to modify the noun “sister”. This word should be an adjective. The structure “my ________ sister” follows the pattern of a possessive determiner (“my”) followed by an adjective and then a noun. Source explicitly states that the adjective is placed before the noun, showing examples like “nice day” and “blue eyes”. Let’s examine the provided options: Favouring: This is generally a present participle, which can sometimes act as an adjective, but “favouring sister” is not a standard or common phrase used in this context to describe a sister you prefer. Favoursome: This is not a recognised English word. Favourite: This is a standard English adjective meaning preferred before all others of the same type. Source uses “favourite” to describe preferred things, such as “My favourite colour is blue” and “My favourite sports are football and swimming”. This demonstrates that “favourite” is used as an adjective modifying a noun (colour, sports) to indicate preference, which fits the context of having a preferred sister among others. Fevor: This appears to be a misspelling of “fervour,” which is a noun, not an adjective, and does not fit the grammatical requirement or meaning of the sentence. Given the options and the grammatical need for an adjective indicating preference, “favourite” is the appropriate choice. Its use as a descriptive adjective indicating preference is supported by examples in the sources. Therefore, the completed sentence is:


Activity Questions 2.5

Notes

Activity Questions 2.5

State whether the following sentence is grammatically right. Degree adverbs are used in front of prepositions. True False Solution Based on the information provided in the sources and our conversation history: The statement “Degree adverbs are used in front of prepositions” is False, according to the sources. Here’s why: Sources define degree adverbs as words or sets of words that give information about the extent or degree of something. Degree adverbs are explicitly stated to be used before adjectives, verbs or other adverbs to provide this information. Examples are given like “extremely sad” (before an adjective), “really hate” (before a verb), and “almost always” (before another adverb). The sources discuss the position of degree adverbs relative to adjectives, verbs, and other adverbs. Source also mentions a “unique ordering” for ‘quite’ and ‘rather’ when they precede an adjective and a noun (e.g., “quite a challenging task” from our conversation, or “a rather painful decision” mentioned in a previous evaluation, although source specifically shows “a fairy cold day”, “a very cold day” etc. with the article first, and notes ‘quite, rather’ as unique). While prepositions are discussed extensively in the sources, and prepositional phrases are noted as sometimes functioning adverbially or adjectivally, the sources do not state that degree adverbs modify prepositions themselves or are placed directly in front of prepositions in a modifying role. The examples provided of degree adverbs and what they modify do not include prepositions. Therefore, based on the categories of words that degree adverbs are said to modify (adjectives, verbs, other adverbs), and the absence of any mention or example of degree adverbs modifying prepositions, the statement is not supported by the provided material.


Required and Optional Elements in English Sentences (Complements and Adjuncts)

Notes

Required and Optional Elements in English Sentences (Complements and Adjuncts)

📝 Required & Optional Elements in English Sentences: Complements & Adjuncts 📚 Let’s break down how English sentences are built, looking at the parts that are essential and those that add extra detail! This understanding helps you craft and comprehend sentences with greater accuracy and confidence. 1. The Building Blocks: Sentences & Their Core 🧱 A sentence is a fundamental structural unit in language. Every English sentence must have a subject and a predicate. These are the required components. Subject: The doer or topic of the sentence. Predicate: Contains the verb and all other information related to it. The verb is a very significant part of the predicate. The human mind doesn’t have difficulty processing large sentences, as a sentence is a sentence regardless of its size. Creating larger sentences is often necessary for coherent discourse. 2. Complements (Required Elements) ✅ What they are: Complements are structurally indispensable parts of a sentence, clause, or phrase. They are essential for a sentence to be grammatically complete and understandable. Function: They are typically objects of verbs. Transitive verbs (verbs that perform an action on something) mandatorily require a complement (an object) to complete their meaning. Without them, the sentence feels incomplete. They “complete the sense” or “complete the sentence”. Absence: If a complement is missing, the sentence becomes incomplete and ungrammatical. Example: “Raju needs for his exam” is incomplete because it’s missing “needs what?”. Example: “Ramu eats after dinner” is incomplete; it needs “eats what?”. Placement: Complements are always close to their “heads” (the verb or noun they are completing). Quantity: Generally, a verb will have only one complement. Some “ditransitive verbs” can have two objects, meaning a maximum of two complements. Examples: “John loves Mary”. Here, “Mary” is the direct object and complement of the verb “loves”. “John likes pizza”. “Pizza” is the complement of “likes”. “Drink a glass of water before food”. “A glass of water” is the object and complement of “drink”. 3. Adjuncts (Optional Elements) 🎨 What they are: Adjuncts are structurally dispensable elements in a sentence, clause, or phrase. Their presence or absence does not affect the grammatical correctness of the sentence’s core structure. Function: They provide additional information about the verb, the entire predicate, or even a noun phrase. They modify or describe other parts of the sentence. Often, adjuncts take the form of adverbs or prepositional phrases. Placement: Adjuncts can be placed in various positions, and their order isn’t always fixed. They are not required to be close to the element they modify in the same way complements are. Quantity: Unlike complements, you can have multiple adjuncts in a sentence or phrase. Examples: “John likes pizza with his friends”. “With his friends” provides additional information about liking or pizza but isn’t essential for the verb “likes”. It’s an adjunct of the noun phrase “pizza”. “John and Mary like pizza in the evening”. “In the evening” gives time information about “liking”. “Raju helped Ramu in the morning”. “In the morning” is an adjunct that modifies the verb “helped” by indicating time. “Drink a glass of water before food”. “Before food” is an adjunct that gives information about “water”. 4. Key Differences & Why it Matters 🎯 Complements: Essential for grammatical completeness, usually direct/indirect objects of verbs, and structurally tied closely to their head. Removing them makes a sentence ungrammatical. Adjuncts: Optional elements that add extra information, often adverbs or prepositional phrases, and can be moved or removed without breaking the core sentence structure. Understanding this distinction helps you not only identify the core meaning of a sentence but also to add richness and detail without compromising its grammatical foundation. It boosts your confidence in speaking and writing. ✍️ Practice Questions